Here’s to good old Al Gore for winning (or sharing, to be exact) the Nobel Peace Prize.
The Scribbler admits to having laughed off Gore’s chances just the day before the prize was announced. I mean, he’s done an incredible job of getting this issue onto people’s radar screens, and finally there’s a slight intimation that we, as a planet, may actually start taking some baby steps to reduce the rate at which our emissions are increasing.
But peace? It’s a fair argument that staving off climate change will avert wars over resources (and, let’s face it, over plain dry land). But it’s a stretch to say that talking about doing something about staving off climate change qualifies as work for peace. On the other hand, Yasser Arafat, Shimon Peres, and Yitzhak Rabin got their Peace Prize for shaking hands – and then Palestine imploded six years later.
Another angle, perhaps, is that there’s not a whole lot of peace breaking out in the world right now.
Ridiculed as he may be by the right-wingers, Gore deserves some respect. Outside of an unfortunate period of focus-grouping in mid-2000, he has spent his energy promoting a cause he actually thinks is important – a refreshing tactic for a politician. He survived the indignity of losing an election by getting more votes than his opponent, went home to think, and returned with an honest conviction to talk incoveniently.
That’s not grandstanding, it’s not opportunism, and it’s not political maneuvering. It’s leadership. Remember that?
Previously on s.b.s: The Al Gore Union
to Mark Kraft: I appreciate your work mobilizing for Gore, but please don’t do it in the form of long, form-letter comments. Don’t forget that this site is run by a compulsive editor. So instead of completely deleting your comment, I suggest an edited version:
Mark Kraft thinks Gore’s a visionary and we’d be lucky to have him run for president. If you agree, go to http://www.draftgore.com/