Does the fact that they let Richard Dawkins see the movie, and not PZ Myers, mean that PZ is the bigger “atheist firebrand” of the two? Now there’s a badge of honor. Or perhaps just a sign that Evicted’s producers don’t read much.
Holy Moly, they both sound like total jerks! Sorry! That said, the poor creationists really should either pay more attention or realize that these two sides arguing each other is a pretty pathetic waste of time. (Preferably the second.)
Hugh Powell is a little weary of big-ticket items like Pluto, the Mars rover, and small fossilized humans getting all the science news coverage. Keep an eye out here for wisps and scraps you won't find anywhere else. Particularly about the ocean, which is really cool and, honestly speaking, much bigger than you think.
Holy Great Find, Hugh (+ Ginny)…. that is just plain fantastic. I disturbed at least 3 coworkers with laughter.
Does the fact that they let Richard Dawkins see the movie, and not PZ Myers, mean that PZ is the bigger “atheist firebrand” of the two? Now there’s a badge of honor. Or perhaps just a sign that Evicted’s producers don’t read much.
Once again, the scribbler beats the NYT to the punch…
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/science/21expelledw.html
It’s not that funny.
Yes it is. It *is* that funny. It’s even funnier!
Who is Richard Dawkins?
Francois – not sure if your question was serious, but for the record:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
-Hugh
Holy Moly, they both sound like total jerks! Sorry! That said, the poor creationists really should either pay more attention or realize that these two sides arguing each other is a pretty pathetic waste of time. (Preferably the second.)